MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945699106 · doi:10.1093/jexbot/52.364.2235

Leaf O2 uptake in the dark is independent of coincident CO2 partial pressure

2001· article· en· W1945699106 on OpenAlexaff
Jeffrey S. Amthor, George W. Koch, Jennifer R. Willms, David B. Layzell

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Experimental Botany · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant responses to elevated CO2
Canadian institutionsQueen's UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersU.S. Department of EnergyBiological and Environmental ResearchNational Science Foundation
KeywordsRespirationEffluxOxygenPartial pressureRespiratory systemChemistryCarbon dioxideBiologyBotanyEcologyBiochemistryAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Elevated CO(2), in the dark, is sometimes reported to inhibit leaf respiration, with respiration usually measured as CO(2) efflux. Oxygen uptake may be a better gauge of respiration because non-respiratory processes can affect dark CO(2) efflux in elevated CO(2). Two methods of quantifying O(2) uptake indicated that leaf respiration was unaffected by coincident CO(2) level in the dark.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.429
Threshold uncertainty score0.753

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.257
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations48
Published2001
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Experimental BotanySame topicPlant responses to elevated CO2French-language works237,207