MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1945726129

각국의 워런트와 상법상 관련 쟁점과의 관계 및 도입여부에 관한 연구

2011· article· ko· W1945726129 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
문준우

Bibliographic record

Venue기업법연구 · 2011
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicInsurance and Financial Risk Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWarrantConvertible bondCorporationBusinessStock (firearms)AccountingLawBondEconomicsFinancePolitical scienceEngineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Warrant are issued in U.S. and U.K. and Canada and Australia and Japan. Also, in korea, warrant is allowed under corporation law. But warrant of korea is detachable bond with warrant and stock option. Warrant frequently is issued as sweeteners in connection with the distribution of a debt of preferred stock offering. This is issued in a reorganization to holders of a class of security not otherwise recognized in the reorganization. Also, this is a corporate instruments in the process of mergers and acquisitions. If warrant is to be introduced to the korean corporation law, korea will revise sections of corporation law. For example, these are stock option, bond with warrant, convertible bond. Futhermore, corporation law is going to enact transferring, listing, price of exercise, registration of warrant.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.550
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.018

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.045
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.157 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue기업법연구Same topicInsurance and Financial Risk ManagementFrench-language works237,207