MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1946265111 · doi:10.22231/asyd.v11i2.62

Políticas de nutrición y desarrollo rural en Latinoamérica. La Red de Iniciativa de Nutrición Humana.

2014· article· es· W1946265111 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAgricultura Sociedad y Desarrollo · 2014
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicAgricultural and Food Production Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Guelph
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En Latinoamérica, las comunidades rurales están sufriendo cada vez más de problemas de salud relacionados con la inseguridad alimentaria y con las dietas poco nutritivas. De cara a la acción insuficiente de los gobiernos, los actores no estatales han tomado el liderazgo para atender este asunto, en muchos casos; sin embargo, su trabajo está profundamente entrelazado con los contextos de política en los que operan. Usando un enfoque de estudio de caso comparativo, este artículo propone que un contexto de política que ha llegado más allá de un enfoque de asistencia alimentaria, limitando el comercio libre y promoviendo la pequeña producción sustentable de alimentos, puede ser eficaz para afrontar problemas de nutrición, en parte debido a las sinergias creadas con instituciones no estatales. El artículo también resalta la importancia de establecer redes como una manera de reconstruir el tejido social de las comunidades rurales, promoviendo así los esfuerzos de desarrollo.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.567
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.254
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it