MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1946760866 · doi:10.4000/pistes.1588

Le rôle des syndicats québécois en matière d’accommodement des personnes handicapées

2010· article· fr· W1946760866 on OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Annick Desjardins

Bibliographic record

VenuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santé · 2010
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicSocial Sciences and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’obligation d’accommodement des salariés handicapés, à la faveur de développements jurisprudentiels importants, a pris une certaine ampleur au Québec, de sorte que le rôle de représentation des syndicats a évolué dans le cadre de ces changements. Le syndicat doit composer avec une modification de son rôle qui lui est imposée, qui lui donne des outils puissants pour revendiquer des mesures facilitant l’intégration et le maintien en emploi des salariés aux prises avec des limitations fonctionnelles, mais qui le place dans une situation de devoir arbitrer des intérêts divergents chez ses membres. Le présent texte expose le rôle des syndicats dans cette dynamique nouvelle en relations de travail, ainsi que les limites de l’action syndicale en matière d’accommodement des personnes handicapées.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.384

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0110.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.001
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.316
Teacher spread0.302 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2010
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePerspectives interdisciplinaires sur le travail et la santéSame topicSocial Sciences and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207