MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1946888844 · doi:10.1029/2007gc001901

Strontium isotope constraints on fluid flow in the sheeted dike complex of fast spreading crust: Pervasive fluid flow at Pito Deep

2008· article· en· W1946888844 on OpenAlex
Abigail K. Barker, L. A. Coogan, K. M. Gillis, Dominique Weis

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGeochemistry Geophysics Geosystems · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicGeological and Geochemical Analysis
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British ColumbiaUniversity of Victoria
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeologyCrustDikeHydrothermal circulationOceanic crustTectonicsFluid dynamicsIsotopes of strontiumPetrologyGeochemistrySeawaterProtolithIsotopeSubductionSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Fluid flow through the axial hydrothermal system at fast spreading ridges is investigated using the Sr‐isotopic composition of upper crustal samples recovered from a tectonic window at Pito Deep (NE Easter microplate). Samples from the sheeted dike complex collected away from macroscopic evidence of channelized fluid flow, such as faults and centimeter‐scale hydrothermal veins, show a range of 87 Sr/ 86 Sr from 0.7025 to 0.7030 averaging 0.70276 relative to a protolith with 87 Sr/ 86 Sr of ∼0.7024. There is no systematic variation in 87 Sr/ 86 Sr with depth in the sheeted dike complex. Comparison of these new data with the two other localities that similar data sets exist for (ODP Hole 504B and the Hess Deep tectonic window) reveals that the extent of Sr‐isotope exchange is similar in all of these locations. Models that assume that fluid‐rock reaction occurs during one‐dimensional (recharge) flow lead to significant decreases in the predicted extent of isotopic modification of the rock with depth in the crust. These model results show systematic misfits when compared with the data that can only be avoided if the fluid flow is assumed to be focused in isolated channels with very slow fluid‐rock exchange. In this scenario the fluid at the base of the crust is little modified in 87 Sr/ 86 Sr from seawater and thus unlike vent fluids. Additionally, this model predicts that some rocks should show no change from the fresh‐rock 87 Sr/ 86 Sr, but this is not observed. Alternatively, models in which fluid‐rock reaction occurs during upflow (discharge) as well as downflow, or in which fluids are recirculated within the hydrothermal system, can reproduce the observed lack of variation in 87 Sr/ 86 Sr with depth in the crust. Minimum time‐integrated fluid fluxes, calculated from mass balance, are between 1.5 and 2.6 × 10 6 kg m −2 for all areas studied to date. However, new evidence from both the rocks and a compilation of vent fluid compositions demonstrates that some Sr is leached from the crust. Because this leaching lowers the fluid 87 Sr/ 86 Sr without changing the rock 87 Sr/ 86 Sr, these mass balance models must underestimate the time‐integrated fluid flux. Additionally, these values do not account for fluid flow that is channelized within the crust.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.338
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.195
Teacher spread0.178 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it