MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947367101 · doi:10.1109/icc.2002.997248

A destination-driven shortest path tree algorithm

2003· article· en· W1947367101 on OpenAlexaff
Baoxian Zhang, Hussein T. Mouftah

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicNetwork Traffic and Congestion Control
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceShortest path problemYen's algorithmK shortest path routingConstrained Shortest Path FirstShortest Path Faster AlgorithmMulticastTree (set theory)Shortest-path treeNode (physics)AlgorithmPath (computing)Dijkstra's algorithmMathematical optimizationTheoretical computer scienceDistributed computingMathematicsMinimum spanning treeComputer networkGraphCombinatoricsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Shortest path tree (SPT) is the most widely-used multicast tree type due to its simplicity and low per-destination cost. An SPT is constructed by the union of the shortest paths from the source node to each destination. However, SPT does not consider overall network resource utilization. We propose a destination-driven shortest path tree algorithm, which aims to construct a low-cost SPT by considering link sharing between different destinations. The computational complexity of the presented algorithm is O(|E|log|V|), where |E| and |V| are the number of edges and nodes in a network respectively. Simulation results are used to demonstrate the high performance of the proposed algorithm.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.207
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations26
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicNetwork Traffic and Congestion ControlFrench-language works237,207