MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Method for Comprehensive Evaluation of Enterprise Core Competence and its Application

2009· article· en· W1947370279 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Qing-dong Li

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicInnovation and Knowledge Management
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCore competencyCompetence (human resources)Knowledge managementBusinessFuzzy logicManagementBusiness administrationPsychologyPolitical scienceComputer scienceMarketingEconomicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Enterprise core competence is the key for its success. It is important for the investors and management to know the enterprise core competence. In this paper, the indexes and evaluation method for enterprise core competence is discussed. The core competence of China Petrochemical Company (SINOPEC) is evaluated with the model. Key words: Enterprise core competence; Evaluation method; Fuzzy application Resume: Le competence distinctive de l’entreprise est l’element important pour sa reussite. C’est important pour les investisseurs et les managers de connaitre les competences distinctives de l’entreprise. Dans cet article, des indices et des methodes d’evaluation sur les competences distinctives de l’entreprise ont ete etudies. Les competences distinctives de la Compagnie petrochimique de la Chine (SINOPEC) ont ete evaluees avec cette methode. Mots-Cles: competence distinctive de l’entreprise; methode d’evaluation; application floue

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.890
Threshold uncertainty score0.265

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.344
Teacher spread0.275 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicInnovation and Knowledge ManagementFrench-language works237,207