MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947442016 · doi:10.3822/ijtmb.v1i1.14

From the Editor-in-Chief’s Perspective . . . .

2008· article· en· W1947442016 on OpenAlex
Thomas Findley

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Therapeutic Massage & Bodywork Research Education & Practice · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicMusicians’ Health and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBodyworkPerspective (graphical)Cover (algebra)SociologyEngineering ethicsResource (disambiguation)Library scienceManagementPolitical scienceMedicineEngineeringAlternative medicineComputer scienceVisual artsArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Welcome to the International Journal of Massage and Bodywork (IJMTB)—a journal intended to be a resource for researchers, educators, and practitioners. I have fostered interactions among these three sometimes disparate groups in the fascia research congresses that I organized [Boston 2007 and Amsterdam 2009 (www.fasciacongress.org)]. It is my sincere hope that individual papers in this journal, while focusing on one of these areas, will cover implications for the other two. The integration of these three areas is the path to the most challenging and rewarding advances.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.660
Threshold uncertainty score0.927

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.476
Teacher spread0.386 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it