MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947733994 · doi:10.1002/9781118802366.ch6

Recent Trends in Manufacturing Innovation Policy for the Automotive Sector

2015· other· en· W1947733994 on OpenAlexaff
P.V. Galvin, Elena Goracinova, David A. Wolfe

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicRegional resilience and development
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutomotive industryCommercializationIndustrial organizationGermanBusinessPosition (finance)Relevance (law)ManufacturingManufacturing engineeringEngineeringMarketingPolitical scienceFinance

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This chapter outlines the contributing factors that are changing the nature of manufacturing and their impact on the automotive industry. It provides a general description of the essential features of current manufacturing and automotive-related policies in the United States, Mexico, the EU, Germany and Spain. The chapter discusses the prominent role of state policies in the ongoing shifts in the automotive industry towards a new technological paradigm. In recent decades, the United States placed less emphasis on the relevance of manufacturing in comparison to its German counterparts. Moreover, the commercialization stage of innovation was largely seen as the purview of the private sector. The PIN 2020 seeks to position the Spanish automotive industry as one of the top automotive industries in the world, and it plans to do this by investing for the future in the most competitive market segments such as hybrid, electric and reduced emission vehicles.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.080

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.005
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.091
GPT teacher head0.293
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicRegional resilience and developmentFrench-language works237,207