An increased prevalence of thyroid disease in children with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We reviewed the health records of pediatric patients with 22q11.2 deletion syndrome (22q11.2 DS) seen over a 5-year period in our 22q11.2 DS multidisciplinary clinic. We determined the prevalence of thyroid dysfunction in this population, in comparison to general population data. Statistical tests were applied to investigate trends in gender differences, thyroid disease subtype and co-morbid conditions in the patients identified with thyroid disease. Of 169 subjects (92 male, 77 female) 9.5% had overt thyroid disease; of these, 1.8% had hyperthyroidism and 7.7% had hypothyroidism; 42% of patients with subclinical or prodromal thyroid disease progressed to overt disease. Our data indicate that thyroid disease prevalence in the 22q11DS pediatric population is significantly higher than that in the general pediatric population Furthermore, over 1/3 of patients in our study population who presented with subclinical thyroid disease progressed to overt disease, requiring medical therapy. Thyroid disease screening should be incorporated into routine medical management of children with 22q11.2 DS. Guidelines for screening individuals with 22q11.2 DS are presented.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".