MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1947863262 · doi:10.3968/4307

Study on Status of Rural Poverty Relief Development in Western China and Countermeasures in New Period: Taking Yibin, in Sichuan Province as an Example

2014· article· en· W1947863262 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Yan Hong, Jun Yi

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicRegional Development and Environment
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPovertyWork (physics)ChinaEconomic growthRural povertyEconomic shortageDominance (genetics)Relief WorkDevelopment economicsGovernment (linguistics)Basic needsRural areaEconomicsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rural poverty relief development work has gained significant effects in the new period, but for China as a developing country, rural poverty relief is still the first step of a long march. There is still a long way for poverty relief work. Meanwhile, poverty relief work also has some problems, such as natural restriction, institutional barriers, mechanism shortage and insufficient justice. These problems hinder development of poverty relief work. Thus, in the new period, rural poverty relief work must have new ideas, new thoughts, new measures and mew approaches. To enhance government dominance, to integrate diversified resources, expand the work thoughts and increase capital input are effective measures to develop rural poverty relief in the new period.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.179
Threshold uncertainty score0.357

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.278
Teacher spread0.245 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicRegional Development and EnvironmentFrench-language works237,207