MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1948026143

Secured Transactions Under China and US Law

2015· article· en· W1948026143 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Man Jin

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian social science · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicCorporate Insolvency and Governance
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsChinaCollateralUniform Commercial CodeSecurity interestFlexibility (engineering)BusinessLawProcess (computing)Point (geometry)EnforcementLaw enforcementDatabase transactionComputer securityLaw and economicsComputer scienceFinanceEconomicsPolitical scienceDatabaseManagement
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The secured-credit law is key of modern commercial transactions. Under China’s Property Law, some aspects in terms of secured transactions have been improved with comparison to Security Law (1995), but it is considered to be unsatisfactory. The purpose of this article is to examine the very significant problems of China law on secured transactions, including the narrow range of the movable collateral, the lack of centralized registration system and the cumbersome enforcement process. For a reference, this paper takes Article 9 of United States Uniform Commercial Code as a model to compare the differences in Secured Transactions between China and US: Article 9 made it possible for secured transactions to be conducted with maximum flexibility and efficiency. Based on the reference point, this research also tries to find out to what extent it could be imported to China.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.948
Threshold uncertainty score0.832

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian social scienceSame topicCorporate Insolvency and GovernanceFrench-language works237,207