Population Dynamics of Different Mosquito Species at Lahore College For Women University Campus, Lahore
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was conducted to investigate and identify the different species of mosquitoes found at LCWU campus and to demonstrate the population dynamics and seasonal fluctuations in the breeding peaks of mosquitoes. The species captured were Aedes aegypti , Culex quinquefasciatus , Anopheles stephensi and Anopheles subpictus . These species were found at the suitable breeding sites of LCWU where the seeping, drainage and dampness were present. Bamboo traps were used for capturing the larvae of different mosquitoes. Their population dynamics was strongly related to seasonal temperature. The highest density of Aedes sp. was found in the month of April and lowest was found in the months of December and January, the highest density of Culex sp. was found also in the month of April and lowest was found in December and January and the highest density of Anopheles spp. was found in the month of February and lowest was found in the months of December and January. The abundance was co-related with the seasonal temperature which shows the positive co-relation with Aedes and Culex sp. and negative co-relation with Anopheles spp.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it