Comercio y medio ambiente: aportaciones desde la perspectiva del acuerdo de libre comercio Chile-Canadá
Bibliographic record
Abstract
EN LA PRIMERA PARTE, EL AUTOR ESTABLECE UN MARCO TEORICO Y EXPONE LAS DIFERENTES POSTURAS DE DISTINTOS SECTORES FRENTE A LAS RELACIONES ENTRE COMERCIO Y MEDIO AMBIENTE. EL AUTOR PARTE DE QUE DICHA RELACION HA SUPERADO EL TERRENO ESTRICTAMENTE ECONOMICO, PARA CONVERTIRSE EN UN FENOMENO CUYA PROBLEMATICA Y SOLUCIONES DEBEN SER ABORDADOS POR EL DERECHO. DE ESTA MANERA, EL AUTOR ANALIZA LA REGLAMENTACION Y LAS SOLUCIONES EXISTENTES EN MATERIA AMBIENTAL EN EL TRATADO DE LIBRE COMERCIO ENTRE CHILE Y CANADA, Y EN EL ACUERDO SOBRE MEDIO AMBIENTE ENTRE ESTOS DOS PAISES, ENTRE LAS QUE DESTACAN LOS PROCEDIMIENTOS DE CONSULTA, IMPOSICION DE SANCIONES Y DE SOLUCION DE CONTROVERSIAS. POR ULTIMO, EL AUTOR EXPONE LA REGULACION CANADIENSE EN CUANTO AL COMERCIO MARITIMO Y EL MEDIO AMBIENTE, TOMANDO EN CONSIDERACION LAS DIFICULTADES QUE PUEDE TRAER APAREJADO EL HECHO DE QUE LA LEGISLACION CANADIENSE EN ESTA MATERIA ES MAS AVANZADA QUE LA CHILENA.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.017 | 0.011 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.019 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.006 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.020 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".