La psychothérapie dialectique comportementale des personnalités limites
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Tout clinicien qui travaille un tant soit peu auprès des personnalités limites pourra évoquer une série d'épisodes relationnels intenses qui taxent autant le professionnel que l'individu qui pose ces gestes. Dans ce contexte, le silence des praticiens d'allégeance comportementale en a étonné plus d'un. Ce n'est en effet que depuis le début des années 90 que les préceptes cognitifs-béhavioraux et la technologie afférente sont appliqués au traitement du trouble de la personnalité limite. Les travaux de Linehan se distinguent par les efforts consentis pour démontrer l'efficacité de l'approche dialectique comportementale. Cet article présente l'historique et la philosophie de l'approche de Linehan, les critères diagnostiques, les principaux outils cliniques, l'exploration des dilemmes dialectiques et des modes de traitement ainsi que les stratégies thérapeutiques de base utilisées dans cette approche.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".