MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1948392264 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.0910.3081

The ATLAS Detector: Status and Results from Cosmic Rays

2009· article· en· W1948392264 on OpenAlexfundno aff
James Shank

Bibliographic record

VenueArXiv.org · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicParticle Detector Development and Performance
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersDeutsches Elektronen-SynchrotronInstitut National de Physique Nucléaire et de Physique des ParticulesAgencia Nacional de Promoción Científica y TecnológicaScience and Technology Facilities CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinistrstvo za visoko šolstvo, znanost in tehnologijoCentre National pour la Recherche Scientifique et TechniqueNorges ForskningsrådCentre National de la Recherche ScientifiqueFundação para a Ciência e a TecnologiaMinisterstvo Průmyslu a ObchoduU.S. Department of EnergyNational Natural Science Foundation of ChinaVetenskapsrådetMax-Planck-GesellschaftIsrael Science FoundationLeverhulme TrustGeneral Secretariat for Research and TechnologyFederal Agency of Atomic Energy of the Russian FederationMinistry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and TechnologyNederlandse Organisatie voor Wetenschappelijk OnderzoekBundesministerium für Bildung und ForschungConselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e TecnológicoMinistry of Education and Science of the Russian FederationCERNDeutsche ForschungsgemeinschaftEuropean CommissionTürkiye Atom Enerjisi KurumuBundesministerium für Wissenschaft und ForschungSchweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen ForschungJavna Agencija za Raziskovalno Dejavnost RSKnut och Alice Wallenbergs StiftelseFinanciadora de Estudos e ProjetosJoint Institute for Nuclear ResearchNational Science CouncilNational Science Foundation
KeywordsAtlas (anatomy)Large Hadron ColliderAtlas detectorCosmic rayPhysicsDetectorCOSMIC cancer databaseNuclear physicsParticle physicsAstronomyOpticsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The ATLAS detector at the Large Hadron Collider, CERN has been under construction for more than a decade. It is now largely complete and functional. This paper will describe the state of the major subsystems of ATLAS. Results from the brief single beam running period in 2008 will be shown. In addition, results from a long period of cosmic ray running will be shown. These results show that ATLAS is prepared to make major new physics discoveries as soon as we get colliding beams in late 2009.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.042
Threshold uncertainty score0.342

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.217 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueArXiv.orgSame topicParticle Detector Development and PerformanceFrench-language works237,207