Effect of Conjugated Linoleic Acid on Reproductive Performance of Gilts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the supplementation of compound feed during rearing and before serving of gilts with conjugated linoleic acid (CLA) influences the organometric parameters of their reproductive system and their reproductive performance. The experimental work was carried out in operating conditions of a production pig farm. Total number of 80 gilts (40 gilts in control group and 40 gilts in experimental group) of hybrid combination Czech Large White x Czech Landrace (CLW x CL) were included in the observation. During the experiment the gilts were fed with a control compound feed and an experimental compound feed suplemented with 2% of CLA for the time of 65 days. After insemination, 20 gilts from both groups were selected randomly, in which organometric parameters of reproductive system were evaluated post mortem. Remaining gilts were tested for their reproductive performance on the first litter. Based on gained results it can be concluded, that the CLA supplementation decreases the mean age of gilts at the time of first service (P < 0.05). The same group recorded trend of higher numbers of ovulated oocytes and collected embryos, however the difference was not statistically significant (P > 0.05). Neither statistically significant differences were found in organometric parameters of the reproductive system (P > 0.05). Evaluation of reproductive performance parametres revealed reaching better results in the experimental group (P < 0.05). These findings demonstrate that the supplementation of diet for gilts during rearing with CLA can improve their reproductive performance.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".