Optimization of the breakdown voltage in LDMOS transistors using internal field rings
Bibliographic record
Abstract
It is shown that field rings in the drift region of LDMOS (lateral double diffused MOS) transistors can be used to reduce the electric field at the Si/SiO/sub 2/ interface and increase the breakdown voltage of the structure. A first order analytical approach shows the upper limit of the position of the ring with respect to the channel, and the doping concentration within the ring to increase the breakdown voltage. A 2-D numerical calculation of the breakdown voltage and on-resistance of the LDMOS transistor is presented. The results, which support the analytical approach, allow the designer to use simple design rules for the implantation of high-voltage LDMOS transistors on thick epitaxial layers. A potential improvement of the breakdown voltage arises if the distance between the channel and the field ring is equal to the field plate length and the doping concentration in the ring satisfies a specified equation. Doubling the breakdown voltage is associated with a 25% increase in device area. The on-resistance depends mainly on the field ring position with respect to the channel. A good tradeoff between the breakdown voltage and on-resistance is obtained when the channel-ring distance is equal to the field plate length.>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".