MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1948852290 · doi:10.1002/acs.2292

Asymptotic rejection of nonvanishing disturbances despite plant–model mismatch

2012· article· en· W1948852290 on OpenAlexaff
Ph. Müllhaupt, S. Valentinotti, Bikshandarkoil R. Srinivasan, Dominique Bonvin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal Processing · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicIterative Learning Control Systems
Canadian institutionsPolytechnique Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParametrization (atmospheric modeling)Control theory (sociology)PolynomialMinificationMathematicsApplied mathematicsInternal modelAdaptive controlClosed loopControl (management)Computer scienceMathematical optimizationEngineeringControl engineeringMathematical analysisPhysicsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

SUMMARY A direct adaptive control methodology for the rejection of unmeasured nonvanishing disturbances is proposed. The approach uses the framework of polynomial RST controllers and relies on the internal model principle with additional degrees of freedom provided by theQparametrization. The parameters of theQpolynomial are adapted using minimization of the closed‐loop output error. Asymptotic rejection of unmeasured nonvanishing disturbances is guaranteed under the assumption that the closed‐loop plant remains stable. A simulation example illustrates the theoretical developments. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2012
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Adaptive Control and Signal ProcessingSame topicIterative Learning Control SystemsFrench-language works237,207