LACROIX, Jean-Guy et TREMBLAY, Gaëtan (Dirs.) (1995). Les autoroutes de l'information. Un produit de la convergence. Sainte-Foy: Presses de l'Université du Québec. 555 pages.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Alors que les autoroutes de l'information constituent l'un des themes les plus mediatises de ces derniers mois, un ouvrage abordant avec serieux et recul la question etait plus que jamais necessaire. Voila qui est fait avec Les autoroutes de l'information. Un produit de la qui s'interesse a ces fameuses routes sous des aspects economiques, politiques, sociaux et techniques. Cet ouvrage represente avec un livre precedent intitule De la telematique aux autoroutes electroniques. Le grand projet reconduit (1) la concretisation d'un programme de recherche franco-quebecois de quatre ans sur la convergence des technologies de l'information. Celui-ci a ete realise a partir des contributions de 77 conferenciers qui ont participe du 29 septembre au 1er octobre 1994 a un symposium international sur la convergence des techniques de communication a Montreal.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.007 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.073 | 0.031 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".