The Fragile Rise of Bourgeois Hegemony and the Neoliberal State in Mexico
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The corporate offensive was the main driving force in the neoliberal transformation of Mexico as it was in the United States and Canada. But in Mexico the corporate power bloc had to change the political order to achieve its hegemonic aspirations and desired policy changes. While the top bourgeoisie have been able to achieve more direct control of the state, they have not been able to establish a stable system of domination. The rise of bourgeois hegemony in Mexico is fragile. But the working class has not yet been able to find its voice and break free of the bonds of Mexico’s old state-linked unions or state system of labour repression in general. However, the on-going hardships imposed by neoliberalism, the fragile legitimacy of the new political regime, and the surviving popular traditions of revolutionary struggle point to a renewal of a class-based popular fight-back sooner rather than later. L’offensive du patronat a été la force prépondérante derrière la transformation néolibérale du Mexique, comme aux Etats-Unis et au Canada. Mais, au Mexique, le bloc du pouvoir patronal était obligé de transformer l’ordre politique afin de réaliser ses aspirations hégémoniques et la transformations politiques souhaitées. Alors que la haute bourgeoisie a réussi à renforcer son contrôle direct sur l’état, elle n’a pas réussi à établir un système stable de domination. L’ascendance de l’hégémonie bourgeoise au Mexique est fragile. Mais, la classe ouvrière n’a pas encore réussi à trouver sa voix et à briser les chaines des anciens syndicats liés à l’état mexicain ou le système étatique de répression du travail en général. Néanmoins, les difficultés de longue durée imposée par le néolibéralisme, la légitimité fragile du nouveau régime politique et les traditions populaires de lutte révolutionnaire qui persistent, suggère la renaissance d’une contre-attaque populaire basée sur les classes, plus tôt et non plus tard.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".