MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1949195300

More Play, Please: The Perspective of Kindergarten Teachers on Play in the Classroom.

2015· article· en· W1949195300 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicChild Development and Digital Technology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNetnographyPsychologyPedagogyMathematics educationVariety (cybernetics)Teaching methodSocial studiesSociologySocial mediaPolitical science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

e past decade has seen an increase in research documenting the benets of children learning through play. However, the amount of play in American kin-dergarten classes remains on a steady decline. is article compares the ndings from a netnographic study of seventy-eight kindergarten teachers ’ message board discussions about play in kindergarten with those of more traditional studies and nds the teachers ’ discussions in broad agreement with past research. e results further demonstrate that kindergarten teachers feel pressures from other teachers, principals, and school policies to focus on academic goals and that these pressures lead them to limit play. e author argues for further research to develop eec-tive strategies to help teachers include play in kindergartens rather than merely increasing teacher awareness of the benets of play. She details how a netnographic approach can complement traditional methods for understanding how teachers treat play in their classrooms. Key words: kindergarten; netnography; No Child Le! Behind Act (NCLB); play-based teaching; Social Ecological eory (SET) Play in American Kindergartens In the past decade, play research has witnessed a rise in two seemingly contradictory trends. First, the research increasingly shows that play expedites a variety of social, cognitive, motor, and linguistic improvements (Eberle 2011; Fisher et al. 2011). Social play allows children to become more creative and more adept at explaining meaning verbally, more successful at manipulating dierent symbol systems, and more condent when experimenting with new activities (Bjorklund and Gardiner 2011; Eberle 2011; Pellegini 2009). In school settings, teachers gently guide play, using play-based teaching and learning activities to promote curricular goals while maintaining the critically important aspects of play—such as children’s intrinsic motivation to engage in play (Bordova,

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.687
Threshold uncertainty score0.391

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.323
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations100
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicChild Development and Digital TechnologyFrench-language works237,207