MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1949689047 · doi:10.1177/0954410013513753

Attitude control of Earth-pointing spacecraft using nonlinear H∞ control

2013· article· en· W1949689047 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part G Journal of Aerospace Engineering · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpacecraft Dynamics and Control
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Toronto
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpacecraftControl theory (sociology)Attitude controlNonlinear systemSeries (stratigraphy)Orbit (dynamics)Taylor seriesNonlinear controlTorqueCircular orbitControl (management)PhysicsComputer scienceMathematicsControl engineeringAerospace engineeringEngineeringClassical mechanicsMathematical analysisGeologyArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The attitude control of an Earth-pointing spacecraft in a circular orbit, subject to the gravity-gradient torque, is explored. The spacecraft attitude is described using the modified Rodrigues parameters. A series of controllers are designed using the nonlinear [Formula: see text] control methodology and are subsequently generated using a Taylor series expansion to approximate solutions of the Hamilton–Jacobi equations. These controllers are applied to the problem of Earth-pointing spacecraft in circular orbits. The controllers are compared using both input–output and initial condition simulations, in an effort to gauge the improvements made possible by nonlinear feedback.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.404
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.005
GPT teacher head0.183
Teacher spread0.177 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it