MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1950012408

Screen Jesus: Portrayals of Christ in Television and Film by Peter Malone (review)

2015· article· en· W1950012408 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Phil Robins

Bibliographic record

VenueFilm & history · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHistorical and Religious Studies of Rome
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPassionTheologyArt historyWrightArtSubject (documents)SuperstarTemptationPhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Screen Jesus: Portrayals of Christ in Television and Film Peter Malone. Lanham, MD: Scarecrow Press, 2012, xvii +317 pages, hbk. ISBN 978-0-8108-83895 $55.Cinematically speaking, Jesus Christ certainly is a superstar. From Cecil B. DeMille to Mel Gibson and beyond, Nazarene has proved a popular, if controversial, subject for film treatment, and Peter Malone's second book on subject provides what is perhaps most comprehensive survey of such material to date. Flowever, Screen Jesus does follow in wake of a considerable number of similar studies with remarkably similar titles, including: Roy Kinnard and Tim Davis's Divine Images; A History of Jesus on Screen (New York: Citadel Press, 1992); Lloyd Baugh's Imaging Divine: Jesus and Christ-Figures in Film (Kansas City: Sheed & Ward, 1997); Richard C. Stern, Clayton N. Jefford, and Guerric Debona's, Savior on Silver Screen (Mahwah, NJ: Paulist Press, 1999); W. Barnes Tatum's, Jesus at Movies: A Guide to First Hundred Years (Revised edition, Santa Rosa, CA: Polebridge Press, 2004) and Adele Reinhartz's, Jesus of Hollwood (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007). With exception of Reinhartz, most of these authors focus fairly narrowly on a corpus of most celebrated Jesus films, including De Mille's King of Kings (1927), Nicholas Ray's King of Kings (1961), Pier Paolo Pasolini's II Vangelo secundo Matteo (1965), George Stevens's Greatest Story Ever Told (1965), Martin Scorsese's Last Temptation of Christ (1988), Denys Arcand's Jesus of Montreal (1989), and - in more recent studies - Mel Gibson's Passion of Christ (2004). Malone covers these core films too, but also takes a much broader view that includes not only television treatments, such as Franco Zeffirelli's landmark 1977 series, Jesus of Nazareth, with Robert Powell as a strikingly handsome Jesus, as well as an impressive range of lesser-known international films not only from Europe but also from Mexico, Iran, India and elsewhere. Malone's select filmography of what he regards as The Major Jesus Films (271) includes eighty-odd items.This inclusiveness is largely a good thing, and it is certainly refreshing to have some reasonably substantial discussion of important but relatively little-known films like Julien Duvivier's very French Golgotha (1935) - first sound-picture to deal with Christ's passion, with Jean Gabin as a memorably pensive Pontius Pilate - and Roberto Rossellini's exquisitely paced but doggedly unspectacular 1975 Italian television film II Messia. Fascinating, too, are Malone's accounts of Klaus Kinski's 1970s one-man performance piece, Jesus Christus Erloser (the film of which, directed by Peter Geyer, was released in 2008), and of Dennis Potter's 1969 British television play Son of Man. And it is to author's credit that his background as a priest and theologian does not prevent him from accommodating useful discussion of Monty Python's Life of Brian (1979); though irreverent, Malone contends, the film is not blasphemous (100). But desire for inclusiveness is ultimately book's undoing, since meaningful discursive momentum that is sustained in first half subsequently gives way in final chapters to a mere listing of anything vaguely Jesus-related. This capitulation to mere cataloguing is a shame, especially as Malone starts his book with a useful distinction that promises to keep project focused. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Review · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.558
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.184 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreReview

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFilm & historySame topicHistorical and Religious Studies of RomeFrench-language works237,207