Bibliographic record
Abstract
La cittŕ di Montreal continua a giocare un ruolo preponderante in materia di sviluppo e di pianificazione della biodiversitŕ, sia alla scala locale che internazionale. Il Settore di Coordinamento della Biodiversitŕ della Cittŕ di Montreal, promuove azioni di diffusione e di integrazione tra le politiche settoriali, della natura in cittŕ, dell'ambiente e dello sviluppo sostenibile. La cittŕ porta avanti modelli di pianificazione della biodiversitŕ e della loro interessante trasversalitŕ nei diversi livelli operativi e amministrativi, presi come esempi da altre realtŕ urbane canadesi e internazionali. Gli strumenti urbanistici municipali mirano alla prevenzione, educazione, conservazione e concertazione, grazie alla ricerca scientifica, alla gestione ecologica dei grandi parchi, alla preservazione degli ecosistemi urbani e alla salvaguardia delle specie rare.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.032 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".