MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1950250490 · doi:10.4171/prims/170

The Denominators of Normalized $R$-matrices of Types $A_{2n-1}^{(2)}$, $A_{2n}^{(2)}$, $B_{n}^{(1)}$ and $D_{n+1}^{(2)}$

2015· preprint· en· W1950250490 on OpenAlexaff
Se‐jin Oh

Bibliographic record

VenuePublications of the Research Institute for Mathematical Sciences · 2015
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial models
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuiverMathematicsAffine transformationPure mathematicsType (biology)Duality (order theory)FunctorSimple (philosophy)Quantum affine algebraQuantumCombinatoricsAlgebra over a fieldPhysicsQuantum mechanicsCellular algebraAlgebra representation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The denominators of normalized R -matrices provide important information on finite dimensional integrable representations over quantum affine algebras, and finite dimensional graded representations over quiver Hecke algebras by the generalized quantum affine Schur-Weyl duality functors. We compute the denominators of all normalized R -matrices between fundamental representations of types A_{2n-1}^{(2)} (n \ge 3) , A_{2n}^{(2)} (n \ge 2) , B_{n}^{(1)} (n \ge 3) and D_{n+1}^{(2)} (n \ge 2) . Thus we can conclude that the normalized R -matrices of types A_{2n-1}^{(2)} , A_{2n}^{(2)} , B_{n}^{(1)} and D_{3}^{(2)} have only simple poles, and of type D_{n+1}^{(2)} (n \ge 3) have double poles under certain conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.015
Threshold uncertainty score0.050

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0150.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.256
GPT teacher head0.457
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuePublications of the Research Institute for Mathematical SciencesSame topicAlgebraic structures and combinatorial modelsFrench-language works237,207