THEME SESSION: SENSORY-COGNITIVE INTERACTIONS IN SPEECH COMPREHENSION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
To comprehend speech, listeners must separate the information available in the speech signal from auditory interference produced by other concurrent sound sources (auditory scene analysis). Auditory scene analysis depends not only on a number of bottom-up sensory processes involved in signal extraction, but also on a number of knowledge-driven, top-town processes (for example, prior knowledge of the topic of conversation). Hence, how effective listeners will be with respect to the extraction of the relevant information will depend not only on their sensory acuity but also on their command of the language, and the effectiveness of the cognitive processes involved in these top-down processes. In this theme session we will discuss how age-related changes in sensory and cognitive processes alter the manner in which scene analysis is performed, and how the listener’s command of the language, and the language itself affects a listener’s ability to comprehend spoken language.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it