The origin of annular junctions: a mechanism of gap junction internalization
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Gap junctional intercellular communication is established when connexin proteins oligomerize into connexon hemichannels, which then pair at the cell surface with connexons from neighboring cells to form functional gap junction channels. Gap junction channels routinely cluster into gap junction plaques, which can exhibit dynamic characteristics while under the frequent processes of formation and removal from the cell surface. We have three lines of evidence to suggest that one mechanism of gap junction removal occurs when one of two contacting cells internalizes the gap junction contribution from both cells. First, in coculture experiments, green fluorescent protein-tagged connexin43 (Cx43-GFP) expressed in normal rat kidney (NRK) cells can be internalized into contacting cells that do not express Cx43-GFP, and the incidences of identifying these internalized structures increase in the presence of lysosomal inhibitors. Secondly, time-lapse imaging of live NRK cells revealed that large areas of gap junction plaques containing Cx43-GFP were internalized as vesicular-like structures into one of two adjacent cells. Finally, when live NRK cells that express endogenous Cx43 were microinjected with anti-Cx43 antibodies, antibody-tagged gap junctions were visualized in cells that contacted the microinjected cell within 3-6.5 hours. Together our results strongly suggest that one mechanism of gap junction removal from the cell surface involves a unique process in which the entire gap junction or a fragment of it is internalized into one of the two contacting cells as an annular junction.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it