Reproductive phase dependent variation in lung-associated immune system (LAIS) and expression of melatonin receptors (Mel<sub>1a</sub> and Mel<sub>1b</sub>) in the lung of the Jungle-Bush Quail (<i>Perdicula asiatica</i>)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The present study was performed to assess the variation of the lung-associated immune system (LAIS) in the Jungle-Bush Quail ( Perdicula asiatica (Latham, 1790)) during two different reproductive phases when differences in the circulatory level of hormones (melatonin and gonadal steroid) and environmental conditions were maximum. We noted high significant variation in size and number of bronchus-associated lymphoid tissue (BALT) nodules, as well as in the size and number of non-BALT nodules, during the reproductively inactive phase (RIP; December) compared with the active phase (RAP; June). We also noted high significant variation in the percent stimulation ratio of lung lymphocyte, as well as in the concentrations of plasma melatonin and melatonin receptors, during RIP compared with RAP. Testosterone level and number of macrophages in lungs were high during RAP. Thus, we suggest that the LAIS had reproductive phase dependent variation, which could be due to (i) variation in environmental factors (photoperiod, temperature, and humidity) and (ii) circulatory level of hormones (melatonin and testosterone). Because of the importance of melatonin in avian immune regulation, we assess and document the expression of melatonin receptor types Mel1a and Mel1b in the avian lung, which suggest that the lung is a target organ for melatonin and that melatonin is an immunomodulator for lung-associated immunity in birds.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".