MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1950939334 · doi:10.5376/rgg.2011.02.0002

Genetic and Expression Analyses of a Male Sterile Gene <i>MGA1(t)</i> in Rice (<i>Oryza sativa</i> L. )

2011· article· en· W1950939334 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Rui Chen, Qingxian Li, Fake Yu, Shaohua Yang, Huaqing Liu, Shufen Zhou, Feng Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueRice Genomics and Genetics · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicPlant Reproductive Biology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOryza sativaGeneBiologyGeneticsOryzaBotany

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A male gamete sterile mutant (tentatively named Male gametophyte abortion1 , mga1 ( t )) was obtained by abnormality screening of transgenic rice materials in this study. The ratio of marker gene segregation was 1:1 by χ 2 - test and the pollen grains of the mutant were half sterile. The phenotype of pollen abortion was found co-segregating with T-DNA insertion in mga1 ( t ) mutant, and T-DNA passed only through the female gamete. Southern blot analysis indicated that T-DNA inserted into the genome of the mutant was single copy. Flanking sequence analysis showed that T-DNA was inserted into the 5' untranslated region of a Bax inhibitor (BI) - 1 like family protein gene in rice chromosome 3. BI - 1 like protein gene was predicted to be involved in programmed cell death. RT-PCR expression analyses revealed that MGA1 ( t ) gene expressed during the whole growth and development stages of rice, and had a strong expression pattern in the spikelets with the length about 0~7 mm. These results indicated that MGA1 ( t ) gene was a male-preferential expressed gene.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRice Genomics and GeneticsSame topicPlant Reproductive BiologyFrench-language works237,207