Bibliographic record
Abstract
this article focuses on the obvious elements of social protest in the novel from the Marxist perspective: the plight of migrant workers, a theme that is later developed more fully in Stainbeck’s masterpiece the Grapes of Wrath (1939); racial discrimination and the social prejudice towards women. Elements of social protest, however, are slight when compared with the more universal message of the story, a lack underscored by the fact that the characters have no visible social awareness of their situation and the cause-source for that. Therefore, the article goes into further study on the cause-source for the miserable situation of the migrant workers and other lower-class people. It comes to the conclusion that the social system is to blame and be responsible for the sufferings of the characters. Key words: John Steinbeck, Of Mice and Men, Marxist perspective, social protest Resume: Ce texte se focalise sur les elements evidents de la protestation sociale dans la nouvelle dans une perspective marxiste : la situation difficile des travailleurs migrants , un theme qui est ensuite develppe plus profondement dans le chef-d’oeuvre 《the Grapes of Wrath》(1939) de John Stainbeck ; la discrimination de race et le prejuge social envers les femmes . De toute facon , la protestation sociale des elements sont legeres par rapport au message universel de l’histoire , la manque soulignee par le fait que les heros ne sont pas visiblement conscients de leur situation ainsi que la cause-source . Par consequent , ce texte fait des etues plus approfondies sur la cause-source de la situation miserable des travailleurs-migrants , et les antres gens les plus demunis de la societe . Il conclut enfin que le systeme social se doit etre critique et qu’il est responsible pour la souffrance des heros . mots-cles: John Steinbeck, De Mice and Men, perspective marxiste, protestation sociale
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.007 | 0.025 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.007 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".