MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951156864 · doi:10.1139/cjp-2014-0192

Transition probabilities, oscillator strengths, and test of <i>J</i>-file sum rule for the 2p<sup>5</sup>3p → 2p<sup>5</sup>3s transition array in the neon emission spectra

2014· article· en· W1951156864 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Naveed K. Piracha, Dan Delanis, John Kaminsky, Katherine Duncan-Chamberlin, Haroon Asghar, Raheel Ali, M A Baig

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Physics · 2014
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasma
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsNeonPhysicsAtomic physicsSpectral lineLine (geometry)Excited stateOscillator strengthSum rule in quantum mechanicsEmission spectrumMolecular electronic transitionHollow-cathode lampWavelengthOpticsQuantum mechanicsArgon

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work experimental transition probabilities, line strengths, and atomic oscillator strengths of 30 spectral lines corresponding to the 2p 5 3p → 2p 5 3s transitions array of neon have been deduced using a neon-filled hollow cathode lamp in conjunction with two spectrographs covering the wavelength region from 500 to 1000 nm. The experimental absolute transition probabilities have been determined using the relative intensity method and lifetimes of the excited states. The transition probabilities have been converted to the line strengths data and used for testing the J-file sum rule. Relative line strengths of all the lines have been computed to determine the oscillator strength values. The measured transition probabilities, oscillator strengths, and relative line strengths agree well with the previously reported data.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.129
Threshold uncertainty score0.735

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.191
Teacher spread0.185 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of PhysicsSame topicLaser-induced spectroscopy and plasmaFrench-language works237,207