MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951275203 · doi:10.29312/remexca.v5i2.958

Competitividad de la carne de ganado bovino entre los paises miembros del TLCAN 1997-2008

2018· article· es· W1951275203 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
José Miguel Omaña Silvestre, Isael Almora Bustos, B Cruz Galindo, Gabriela L. Hoyos Fernández, Juan Manuel Quintero-Ramírez, Manuel Fortis-Hernández

Bibliographic record

VenueRevista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas · 2018
Typearticle
Languagees
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolitical scienceHumanitiesPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

El presente trabajo analiza la competitividad comercial de carne de ganado bovino entre los países miembros del Tratado de Libre Comercio deAmérica del Norte (TLCAN): México, Canadá y Estados Unidos de América. La metodología utilizada es mediante indicadores de mercado: participación de mercado, coeficiente de ventaja comparativa revelada (CVCR), tasa de penetración de las importaciones (TPI) y producción expuesta a la competencia (PEC), para ello se utilizan datos del período 1997-2008, comparando los valores promedio de 1997 a 1999 contra los valores promedio de 2006 a 2008. Esto permitió observar el desarrollo de la competitividad de los 3 socios comerciales a nivel mundial y además permite observar la evolución de la competitividad de Canadá y México como principales proveedores de carne de ganado vacuno del mercado estadounidense.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.604
Threshold uncertainty score0.797

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2018
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueRevista Mexicana de Ciencias AgrícolasSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207