MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951292653 · doi:10.15866/ireheat.v2i3.4353

The Effects of Thermally Induced Residual Stress on the Fatigue Behaviour of Fibre Metal Laminates

2013· article· en· W1951292653 on OpenAlexaff
P.P. Krimbalis, C. Poon, Zouheir Fawaz, Kamran Behdinan

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal on Heat and Mass Transfer - Theory and Applications (IREHEAT) · 2013
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Behavior of Composites
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResidual stressMaterials scienceComposite materialStress intensity factorBridging (networking)Ultimate tensile strengthAluminiumCuring (chemistry)ResidualStress (linguistics)Structural engineeringFracture mechanicsComputer scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The focus of this study is the examination and modification of existing analytical models for the calculation of effective stress intensity factor range and prediction of fatigue crack growth rates in GLass REinforced (GLARE) fibre metal laminates (FMLs). The effects of tensile residual stress have been largely unconsidered by existing models and therefore a modified model for calculating effective stress intensity factor range as well as crack propagation rate has been proposed. This modification includes the detrimental tensile residual stresses induced in the aluminum layers as a result of the laminate curing process. A previous model developed with the implementation of the fibre bridging mechanism has also been modified to include residual stress. The results of the analysis agree well with the trends and magnitudes found in the literature, though due to a lack of available experimental data, a direct evaluation of the proposed modifications was not possible.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.297
Threshold uncertainty score0.327

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2013
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal on Heat and Mass Transfer - Theory and Applications (IREHEAT)Same topicMechanical Behavior of CompositesFrench-language works237,207