Raman study of datolite CaBSiO<sub>4</sub>(OH) at simultaneously high pressure and high temperature
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Using an in situ method of Raman spectroscopy and resistance‐heated diamond anvil cell, the system datolite CaBSiO4(OH) – water has been investigated at simultaneously high pressure and temperature (up to Р ~5 GPa and Т ~250 °С). Two polymorphic transitions have been observed: (1) pressure‐induced phase transition or the feature in pressure dependence of Raman band wavenumbers at P = 2 GPа and constant T = 22 °С and (2) heating‐induced phase transition at T ~90 °С and P ~5 GPа. The number of Raman bands is retained at the first transition but changed at the second transition. The first transition is mainly distinguished by the changes in the slopes of pressure dependence of Raman peaks at 2 GPa. The second transition is characterized by several strong changes: the wavenumber jumps of major bands, the merging of strong doublets at 378 and 391 cm−1 (values for ambient conditions), the splitting of the intermediate‐intensity band at 292 cm−1, and the transformation of some low‐wavenumber bands at 160–190 cm−1. No spectral and visual signs of overhydration and amorphization have been observed. No noticeable dissolution of datolite in the water medium occurred at 5 GPa and 250 °С after 3 h, which corresponds to typical conditions of the ‘cold’ zones of slab subduction. Copyright © 2014 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".