MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951376377 · doi:10.7202/1029021ar

De la conservation à la restitution

2015· article· fr· W1951376377 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Frédéric Laugrand, Jarich Oosten

Bibliographic record

VenueAnthropologie et Sociétés · 2015
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicArchaeology and Rock Art Studies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cet article traite de l’itinéraire d’un qalugiujaq , un couteau miniature ayant appartenu au célèbre chamane Qimuksiraaq. L’objet a été trouvé dans un fonds d’archives des Soeurs grises de Nicolet, et récemment restitué à un descendant de ce chamane. Les auteurs soulignent l’agencéité de ces objets miniatures capables de créer des connexions dans le temps ou dans l’espace. Ici, le pouvoir transformationnel de la miniature à l’étude demeure visiblement intact en dépit de plusieurs décennies de christianisation. Au-delà de mesures dites d’indigénisation, ce constat devrait conduire les musées à plus d’ouverture et de prudence dans la gestion de leurs collections d’objets miniatures.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.066

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0080.014
Scholarly communication0.0060.004
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.318
GPT teacher head0.615
Teacher spread0.296 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2015
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnthropologie et SociétésSame topicArchaeology and Rock Art StudiesFrench-language works237,207