MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951409579 · doi:10.7454/jki.v11i1.181

Uji Coba Model Pendeteksian Terhadap Penganiayaan Usia Lanjut di Keluarga

2007· article· id· W1951409579 on OpenAlexaff
Etty Rekawati, Widyatuti Widyatuti, Poppy Fitriyani

Bibliographic record

VenueJurnal Keperawatan Indonesia · 2007
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicElder Abuse and Neglect
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGynecologyPhysicsMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

AbstrakTujuan penelitian ini adalah tersusunnya model pendeteksian terhadap penganiayaan usia lanjut di keluarga. Desain yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah riset operasional, yang pelaksanaannya pada tahap I desain yang digunakan adalah eksploratif, pada tahap II menggunakan desain konfirmatif dan tahap III pengambilan data untuk mengidentifikasi masalah penganiayaan usia lanjut di keluarga. Sampel yang digunakan 11 petugas kesehatan dan 44 usia lanjut yang tinggal di keluarga yang dipilih secara acak di Kecamatan X di wilayah Jakarta Timur. Berdasarkan analisis data diperoleh hasil: instrumen yang digunakan pada penelitian ini didapatkan nilai kevalidan sebesar 0,6900 – 0,7378 yang merupakan nilai lebih dari nilai r tabel (r = 0,288), ini menyatakan bahwa hubungan antar pertanyaan dengan nilai keseluruhan instrument cukup baik, dengan realibilitas (menggunakan α-cronbah) sebesar 0,7275. Masalah penganiayaan yang ditemukan adalah sebesar 18,18% usia lanjut di keluarga mengalami penganiayaan fisik, 97,73% penganiayaan emosi, 13,64% penganiayaan seksual, 31,82% penganiayaan ekonomi/finansial, 61,36% pengabaian dan 29,55% mengalami penelantaran. Usia lanjut yang sering mengalami penganiayaan yaitu yang berumur 60 – 75 tahun, berjenis kelamin perempuan, bersuku bangsa Jawa, Agama Islam, tingkat pendidikan SD dan sudah berstatus janda/duda. Model ini dapat digunakan pendeteksian terhadap penganiayaan usia lanjut secara dini sehingga bagi usia lanjut yang sudah terdeteksi dianiaya oleh keluarga dapat dilakukan penanganan secepatnya. AbstractThe purpose of the study was to arrange detection model of elderly abuse in family. This study used operational research that first stage use eksploratif, second stage use confirmative design, and third stage was data collection to identify elderly abuse in family. Sample that was taken are 11 health staff and 44 elderlies who live in family and randomly chosen. The area of this study was in X district, East Jakarta. The result of this study indicated that validity value is 0,6900-0,7378 (r table = 0,288) with reability (use -cronbah) is 0,7275. This study showed that 18,18% of elderly have physical abuse, 97,73% have emotional abuse, 13,64% have sexual abuse, 31,82% have economic/ financial abuse, 61,36% neglect and 29,55% abandon. The elderly that tend to be abused ranges about 60-75 years old, women, Javanese, Islamic, level of education background is primary school, widow/widower. This study can be used to detect elderly abuse as early as possible to improve elderly welfare in community.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.036
Threshold uncertainty score0.121

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0360.009

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.297
Teacher spread0.273 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJurnal Keperawatan IndonesiaSame topicElder Abuse and NeglectFrench-language works237,207