MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W1951452309 · doi:10.1109/aps.1979.1148230

Scattering from an off-axis inhomogeneity in step-index optical fibers-mode conversion

2005· article· en· W1951452309 on OpenAlexaff
A. Safaai‐Jazi, G. L. Yip

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPhotonic and Optical Devices
Canadian institutionsMcGill University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOpticsScatteringDipoleDielectricWaveguidePhysicsExcitationReciprocity (cultural anthropology)Surface waveComputational physicsOptoelectronicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

There is much current interest in dielectric surface waveguides due to their important applications in fiber communication systems. Many theoretical and practical problems are involved. An important problem is the excitation of surface waves and radiation by an infinitesimal dipole in cylindrical dielectric waveguides. The excitation of surface waves has been previously treated by employing the Lorentz reciprocity theorem [1,2] involving the use of the orthogonality relations in the modal fields. This technique, however, does not yield any information about the radiation fields. For waveguides with small dielectric differences between the adjacent layers, the radiation loss due to a localized impurity can be evaluated by the infinite-medium approximation [3]. This method does not yield any information about the surface waves. Yip [4] investigated the excitation of theHE_{11}mode by a transversely-oriented infinitesimal dipole on the axis of a rod, and the resulting formulation was later [5] used to calculate the radiation loss due to scattering from an on-axis inhomogeneity in a cladded fiber optical waveguide.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.238
Teacher spread0.229 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2005
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicPhotonic and Optical Devices→French-language works237,207→