MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951617817 · doi:10.1109/icassp.1995.479459

Crosstalk resistant adaptive noise cancellation applied to somatosensory evoked potential enhancement

2002· article· en· W1951617817 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering Techniques
Canadian institutionsUniversity of New Brunswick
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCrosstalkSomatosensory evoked potentialActive noise controlComputer scienceElectronic engineeringNoise (video)Noise suppressionChannel (broadcasting)TelecommunicationsEngineeringNeuroscienceBandwidth (computing)Artificial intelligencePsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) are extremely useful in peripheral nerve monitoring and in the diagnosis of various neuromuscular disorders. However, surface measurements of these potentials often result in imperceptible SEP waveforms due to the very poor signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Adaptive noise cancelling is an attractive technique which can be used to improve this poor SNR. One of the important factors that affect the performance of an adaptive noise canceller (ANC) is the presence of SEP components in the reference channel of the ANC. The authors propose a novel multichannel crosstalk resistant adaptive noise canceller (MCRANC) for offsetting the problems caused by the "SEP" crosstalk. The performance of this MCRANC is evaluated analytically and through simulations.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.833
Threshold uncertainty score0.984

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.197 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Adaptive Filtering TechniquesFrench-language works237,207