MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1951709597 · doi:10.1109/ceidp.1993.378880

In-situ photoelastic monitoring of electrical treeing in polyethylene

2002· article· en· W1951709597 on OpenAlexaff
Éric David, J.-L. Parpal, J.‐P. Crine

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicSmart Materials for Construction
Canadian institutionsHydro-Québec
Fundersnot available
KeywordsElectrical treeingMaterials sciencePolyethyleneComposite materialElectrodeInternal stressEpoxyElectrical engineeringVoltagePartial dischargeChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The authors investigate the influence of both passive internal strains in drawn PE (polyethylene) samples with semiconductive electrodes and active internal stresses around embedded steel electrodes on the electrical tree growth. Results of insitu photoelastic measurements showing the fringe pattern evolution accompanying tree propagation are also presented. It has been found that the internal stress model developed by J. V. Champion et al (1992) for embedded electrodes in an epoxy resin block can be successfully applied to polyethylene samples. Photoelastic measurement is an efficient and simple tool for experimental determination of such stresses. The electrical performance of polyethylene samples show complex variations in the presence of increasing internal strain. Orientation effects (passive internal stresses) and residual stresses (active internal stresses) might make different contributions, possibly in opposite directions. Nevertheless, it is believed that polyethylene specimens oriented perpendicularly to the make electric field have better resistance to electrical treeing than unoriented samples.< <ETX xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML" xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink">&gt;</ETX>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.064
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.212
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSmart Materials for ConstructionFrench-language works237,207