Les changements possibles du système français de formation continue
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le système français de formation privilégie une « matrice » liant la formation et le travail, le financement par les entreprises et le modèle des stages courts d’adaptation au détriment d’une part d’une matrice reliant à une promotion sociale des formations longues, de type cours du soir, sur financement public et d’autre part d’une matrice centrée sur le développement culturel, la citoyenneté et l’éducation permanente. Les législations récentes (lois de 2002 et 2004) visent à rééquilibrer le système. Quatre changements possibles sont analysés : accroître la responsabilité des adultes, réduire les inégalités, améliorer le rendement des formations pour les salariés et les chômeurs, donner la priorité aux demandes sur les offres de formation, notamment dans un cadre régional. L’inventaire des conditions de ces changements conduit à un optimisme modéré.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it