MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1952182896

Kalman filtering approach to multirate information fusion for soft sensor development

2012· article· en· W1952182896 on OpenAlex
Li Xie, Yijia Zhu, Biao Huang, Yisong Zheng

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Conference on Information Fusion · 2012
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFault Detection and Control Systems
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsKalman filterSoft sensorComputer scienceSensor fusionData miningProcess (computing)Sampling (signal processing)Quality (philosophy)Filter (signal processing)Real-time computingArtificial intelligenceComputer vision
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Accurate and frequent measurements of quality variables are important for real-time process monitoring and control. However, because online measuring instruments commonly have the limitations of high investment and low accuracy, while offline laboratory analyses are obtained manually and infrequently, neither online instruments nor offline analyses can satisfy the requirements of real-time applications in industries alone. In order to obtain more reliable information of quality variables, this paper develops two kinds of adaptive soft sensors in the framework of Kalman filter. The idea is to take the advantages of fast-rate sampling of online data and high-accuracy of lab data by synthesizing these two sources of measurements at different sampling rates. The CSTR case study and applications in a chemical production process demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.871
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it