MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1952344146 · doi:10.1080/15325008.2015.1057882

Synchronous Generator Parameter Estimation Using Data Collected with Machine in Closed-loop Operation

2015· article· en· W1952344146 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueElectric Power Components and Systems · 2015
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicControl Systems and Identification
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsControl theory (sociology)Generator (circuit theory)Estimation theoryPermanent magnet synchronous generatorMonte Carlo methodComputer scienceRotor (electric)Electric power systemInertiaCurrent loopSynchronous motorPower (physics)EngineeringMathematicsAlgorithmVoltageControl (management)StatisticsArtificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Knowledge of synchronous generator physical parameters (such as rotor inertia, inductances, etc.) is desirable for power system analysis and control. Experiments for parameter identification of a synchronous generator, multi-variable, non-linear system can be carried out only with the controllers in action. In this article, estimation of the physical parameters of such systems is investigated using data collected from the machine in closed-loop operation. To obtain good accuracy of parameter estimates, both discrete and continuous-time model structures have been considered. Continuous-time generalized Poisson moment functional method has proven to be very effective. Results of simulation studies with the machine in closed-loop operation show the effectiveness of this approach. Monte Carlo simulations are also used to show the low variance of the estimates in a noisy environment.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.529

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.039
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.199 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it