In Vitro Evaluation of the Antiinflammatory and Anticancer Activities of Compounds from the Plants Casearia sylvestris and Zanthoxylum monophyllum
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The anthocyanins, coumarins, and casearins are interesting compounds due to their chemical and biological properties. In the present study, the in vitro effect of 4 ́-O-methyl-gallocatechin (an anthocyanin), columbianatin (a coumarin), and casearin G on the mitogenic response and phagocytic activity from whole blood cells, was evaluated. In addition, the cytotoxic effect of these compounds on the cell lines B16/BL6 (murine melanoma) and COS-7 (kidney fibroblasts transfected with SV40 virus) was measured by a colorimetric assay (MTS/PMS, IC50: inhibitory concentration) and the sulphorhodamine B assay (GI50: growth inhibition, TGI: total growth inhibition, LC50: lethal concentration). The results show that 4 ́-O-methyl-gallocatechin and columbianatin reduced lymphoproliferation. Columbianatin reduced both the phagocytic index and the percentage of phagocytic monocytes/macrophages. Casearin G showed both cytotoxic (IC50, LC50) and cytostatic (GI50) effects against the tumor cells, B16/BL6 (IC50 = 30.8 μM; GI50 = 12.4 μM; LC50 = 34.7 μM) and COS-7 (IC50 = 137.3 μM; GI50 = 3.8 μM; LC50 = 29.9 μM). In conclusion, 4 ́-O-methyl-gallocatechin and columbianatin showed immunosuppressive properties in vitro while casearin G was the most cytotoxic.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".