MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W195272498

Boondoggling, Baseball, and the WPA

2000· article· en· W195272498 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Robert Kossuth

Bibliographic record

VenueNine · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAmerican Sports and Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeagueCONTESTStadiumState (computer science)ManagementEngineeringPolitical scienceEconomic historyLawHistoryEconomics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cooperstown's Doubleday Field The first Hall of Fame baseball game was played at Doubleday Field in Cooperstown, New York, on June 12, 1939. [1] This contest between American and National League all-star teams was organized to celebrate the official opening of the National Baseball Hall of Fame and Museum. The following year, two Major League teams, the Chicago Cubs and the Boston Red Sox, played in the second Hall of Fame Game, initiating the tradition that continues to the present. [2] The construction of the museum and the reconstitution of Doubleday Field were the result of the efforts of local citizens who, with the support of wealthy benefactors, local and state government officials, and executives of Major League Baseball, were able to capitalize on the myth of Abner Doubleday's invention of baseball in order to cement Cooperstown's place in baseball history. [3] To achieve this end, the village first had to secure funds to purchase the land upon which the first game was said to have been played in 1839, Elihu Phinney's cow pasture . The building of a baseball stadium on this land would then serve as a fitting memorial to commemorate Doubleday's invention of baseball. [4] Therefore, the securing of Doubleday Field and its subsequent modernization between 1938 and 1939, in concert with the construction of the National Baseball Hall of Fame, were critical to ensuring the community's claim to being baseball's birthplace. This claim was confirmed by Major League Baseball's decision to celebrate baseball's centenary in Cooperstown in 1939. The renewal of the Doubleday Field baseball stadium during the depths of the Great Depression by the Village of Cooperstown, a community with a population of only 2,800 people in 1939, presented a number of challenges, particularly in terms of securing financial backing. [5] Completing the reconstitution of Doubleday Field for the summer celebrations of 1939 required funding beyond that which could be provided by local taxpayers and benefactors. To this end, the village sought and received federal relief assistance to fill this funding void in much the same manner that other towns and cities sought to finance public recreation projects. The purpose of this investigation is to determine how the Village of Cooperstown was able to secure federal relief funding and the role this funding played in the modernization of Doubleday Field. In order to understand how federal relief funding was secured, it will be necessary to examine Franklin Delano Roosevelt's (FDR's) position with respect to work relief as expressed through his New Deal policies and programs. Following this, the place of sport and recreation projects within the broader scope of federal relief programs and, specifically, the Work Progress/Projects Administration (WPA) must be determined to understand how Cooperstown was able to access this support. [6] To place this investigation within the broader context of the role played by sport and recreation in the programs that FDR'S New Deal comprised, it is necessary to recognize that the WPA was the most active of all relief programs with respect to the funding of recreation programs and the construction of sport and recreation facilities, it was not surprising that the Village of Cooperstown sought federal aid to assist with the renewal of Doubleday Field. Understanding the WPA'S role in the Doubleday Field project requires that the programs broader economic and social objectives, particularly those concerned with recreation projects, be investigated. Federal support in the form of WPA funding was the critical factor in the reconstitution of Doubleday Field in 1939. This funding, however, may not have been secured without the support of influential WPA administrators, professional baseball executives, and most importantly the efforts of the citizens of Cooperstown. From this latter group, two key individuals sta nd out: Hall of Fame benefactor Stephen Clark and Alexander Cleland, the organizing force behind the building of the Hall of Fame and the success of the centenary celebration. …

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.080
Threshold uncertainty score0.159

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.004
Scholarly communication0.0060.003
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0420.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.179
Teacher spread0.173 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNineSame topicAmerican Sports and LiteratureFrench-language works237,207