MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1952763500 · doi:10.7202/1025231ar

L’influence du clavardage sur la maîtrise du français écrit des élèves du premier cycle du secondaire

2014· article· fr· W1952763500 on OpenAlex
Marie-Ève Gonthier, Stéphanie Leblanc

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.

Bibliographic record

VenueRevue des sciences de l éducation · 2014
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicDigital Communication and Language
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Rimouski
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Cette recherche quantitative a pour objectif de vérifier l’influence du clavardage sur la maîtrise du français écrit des élèves du premier cycle du secondaire au regard des caractéristiques de la langue codée et de la psychologie cognitive. À cet effet, nous avons montré que le clavardage n’a pas d’influence défavorable sur la maîtrise du français écrit de ces élèves, cela par l’intermédiaire d’une dictée et d’un questionnaire sur les habitudes de clavardage. Ainsi, il semble que le clavardage, qui est en plein essor, ne soit pas néfaste pour la langue écrite. Ce constat ouvre d’ailleurs la voie à l’utilisation du clavardage pédagogique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.334
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.003
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.305
Teacher spread0.235 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it