Aneurysm Rupture after Endovascular Flow Diversion: The Possible Role of Persistent Flows through the Transition Zone Associated with Device Deformation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Haemorrhagic complications can occur following aneurysm treatment with flow diverters (FD), but the underlying mechanism remains unknown. We describe a case where deformation of the device may have contributed to the complication. A patient with a giant, previously unruptured cavernous aneurysm that extended intracranially to cause oedema of the internal capsule was treated with flow diversion. Treatment was followed by multiple episodes of peri-aneurysmal haemorrhages within eight days. A deformation of the device which occurred where it curved to cross the aneurysm neck created residual flows which, in the presence of a stent stenosis immediately beyond the neck, may have contributed to the observed ruptures. Following multiple haemorrhages the patient subsequently died. Autopsy demonstrated early red thrombus partially bridging the struts of the flow diverter, and intra-aneurysmal thrombus of various ages. Microscopic pathology showed an aneurysm wall consisting of collagen infiltrated with neutrophils, but the wall was absent near the cerebral peduncle, adjacent to the brain haemorrhage. Radiographs of the extracted specimen confirmed deformation of the FD construct, located at the transition zone of the stent, leading to increased pore size and porosity. The site of the deformation correlated with the angiographic presence of a continued blood inflow jet into the aneurysm. Stent deformation at the transition zone may promote persistent blood entry into the aneurysm, and in turn potentially contribute to haemorrhagic complications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".