O Tratamento Judicial da Violência Conjugal no Canadá: resposta punitiva, marcadores sociais e expectativas das vítimas.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
- A presente pesquisa foi realizada durante o periodo de estagio de doutorado sanduiche, na University of Ottawa, no periodo de julho de 2012 a fevereiro de 2013, tendo como objetivo central a verificacao do funcionamento dos mecanismos judiciais de enfrentamento/tratamento da violencia contra a mulher no Canada. Para a coleta de dados, foi utilizada a analise de documentos oficiais do governo canadense, bem como pesquisa bibliografica. A pesquisa permitiu identificar o fluxo de processamento dos casos de violencia contra a mulher pelo sistema de justica canadense, com as diferentes possibilidades de encaminhamento do agressor. Com base nos dados levantados, e em analises desenvolvidas por pesquisadores canadenses sobre o tema, e possivel afirmar que, ainda que haja um grande investimento do governo canadense e a forte articulacao entre instituicoes de diversos âmbitos estatais, os indices referentes aos conflitos violentos conjugais nao apresentam uma queda significativa. Neste sentido, parece ser razoavel apontar a dificuldade do sistema penal em dar conta de conflitos desta natureza, uma vez que a leitura criminalizante apresenta uma serie de obstaculos para a sua compreensao e intervencao.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.015 | 0.006 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".