MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1953820083

퓨전의 미학 : 프랑스문학

2000· article· ko· W1953820083 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
김남연

Bibliographic record

VenueEtudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en France · 2000
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceEthnologyArtSociology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Jusqu'a nos jours la politique et l'economie etaient au centre des priorites de notre societe mais la se revalorisera au 21 e siecle. La France et le terme culture s'accordent remarquablement. En effet, apres la revolution industrielle, pendant que les Etats-Unis, l'Angleterre, l'Allemagne, et le Japon cherchaient l'expansion economique, la France seule s'est interessee a la valeure culturelle en Europe. Mais parler de la francaise c'est entrer dans une idee trop figee. Notre propos sera d'empecher le grand nombre d'avoir des a priori sur notre sujet et de faire comprendre les aspects originaux et constants de la francaise, voire meme de definir les relations avec notre culture. Mais on ne parlera pas de la competitivite economique ou de l'industrie culturelle, parce que la logique de la est celle de de la coexistance, non pas celle de la competitivite. On parle de la au Canada en terme de Mosaique et aux Etats Unis, en terme de melting pot. Quant a la francaise, l'expression la plus exacte sera la FUSION. La fusion a lieu dans l'ensemble des domaines sociaux et culturels. En France on croise des races et des cultures differentes. Les climats du pays sont aussi tres divers: .on y rencontre le climat oceanique, le climat a tendance continentale, le climat mediterraneen, le climat parisien, le climat montagnard, etc. D'autre part, la politique francaise entre dans une ere nouvelle: la cohabitation. Les ideologies meme se fusionnent en France. Les acteurs principaux de l'arts francais ne sont pas souvent d'origine francaise. On a l'impression que la societe francaise ne s'interesse pas a la nationalite ou a la race. Elle fait plutot en sorte que les capacites artistiques des etrangers se francisent. La caracteristique de la France est basee sur l'art du patchwork (tissu fait de morceaux tres varies cousus les uns aux autres). Elle marie non seulement alimentations, climats, cultures, et races mais associe aussi des epoques, des generations et des modes de vie. L'espoir a l'avenir n'est que dans la fusion des cultures differentes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.057
Threshold uncertainty score0.192

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.007
Scholarly communication0.0120.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0570.032

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEtudes de la Culture Francaise et de Arts en FranceSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207