MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W1953868009 · doi:10.7202/005231ar

Le sort des femmes sous le gouvernement de Vichy (1940-1944)

2002· article· fr· W1953868009 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
François Rouquet

Bibliographic record

VenueLien social et Politiques · 2002
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicFrench Historical and Cultural Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Vichy a assigné à chaque sexe une place dans la société: les femmes devaient (re)devenir mères au foyer et s'occuper de leurs enfants, et les hommes subvenir aux besoins de leur famille. Mais la réalité sociale s'est toujours opposée, entre 1940 et 1944, au discours officiel fondé sur les valeurs du travail, de la famille et de la patrie, dans une imposture toujours grandissante. La politique familiale fut inspirée du Code de la famille né juste avant la guerre, sous la Troisième République. Cependant, les dispositions prises par Vichy avaient en commun de renforcer l'institution familiale plus que d'en protéger les individus. C'est le sens des très sévères mesures répressives contre les pratiques sociales mettant la famille en péril. En dépit d'une certaine continuité des structures familiales après la guerre, la philosophie familiale de Vichy divergeait radicalement de celle de la République puisqu'elle fondait une sorte de légitimité naturelle au conservatisme et à l'immobilisme social.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.151

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0050.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.069
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2002
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLien social et PolitiquesSame topicFrench Historical and Cultural StudiesFrench-language works237,207